So…you think we live on a cartoon and that a cartoon legitimizes your globe earth nonsense?

You actually believe that a MODEL confirms anything? That cartoons somehow define reality?

And WHAT FLAT EARTH MODEL? WHICH ONE? The flat earth society of the disc in the space vacuum just like your flawed garbage spinning monkey ball cartoon?

You globers can’t even decide a shape, for God’s sake. NASA shows a perfect sphere from the second law of thermodynamics violating space vacuum where they cannot go.

WGS84 gives us the good old OBLATE SPHEROID.

Then you have Neil DeGrasse Tyson and his PEAR shaped earth.

Which is it, princess? Which MODEL do you believe?

And could you actually prove that one of your CARTOONS actually represent reality?

Haven’t a single glober than can do that. Ever.

So…I have a few questions of my own.

-Can you give me the IV, DV, CV’s and experiment that proves gravity or general relativity, please? Let me make this clear. Observed NATURAL phenomenon with a description of the CAUSE AND EFFECT.

-Then tell me the INHERENT shape of water.

-Show me water sticking to a spinning ball moving at 1037 mph at the equator in real time in a vacuum chamber.

-Define the conservation of angular momentum and define earth based coriolis effect….and then DEMONSTRATE the supposed 15 degree per hour drift assumed by earth based coriolis in real time in nature with things drifting away at the calculated and proper tangential speed. This is supposedly why the stars move in YOUR MODEL.

SO PROVE IT, THEN. DEMONSTRATE this drift in the inertial reference frame…the same REFERENCE FRAME your “second celestial pole” and your gas giant stars would be in “light years” away. In other words, PROVE AXIAL ROTATION OF THE EARTH.

-Describe the motion and location of this second celestial pole you speak of.

-Then tell me why a compass does not flip when you pass the equator to the south.

-Then Describe the difference between tangential speed and angular velocity.

-Show me water in a CONTAINER that does not lay flat or demonstrate something spinning attracting that water to the center of the object.

-Tell me how you measure the distance to a ball of gas or plasma…in a space vacuum and then describe how this does not violate the second law of thermodynamics.

-Show me air pressure without containment.

-Give me the equations for earth curvature and your terrestrial horizon LIMIT in distance.

-Repeat the black swan argument which you would need the terrestrial refraction limit equation to do.

-Describe the purpose of a MODUS TOLLENS argument.

-Prove the existence and show me absolute evidence of dark matter, space fabric/spacetime (not as a concept but as a palpable and observable phenomenon), a graviton and dark energy.

-Prove the sun is 93 million miles away and prove it is an actual object you CAN measure a distance to as this will be relevant in your gravitational equations for earth.

-Prove the gravitational constant (G) and show me where this is quantified in the Cavendish papers.

-Speaking of the Cavendish papers, show me where the density of the earth is quantified and then show me proof this is correct as you will need this value for the equation F=G(m1m2)/r^2 in order to get those two MASS values. The MASSES of 2 celestial objects.

-Show an example of air pressure without containment without using a begging the question fallacy of a mythical space vacuum. Then show how the V in your example would be measured in the equation PV=nRT.

-Prove the shape of the earth. Sphere? Oblate spheroid? Pear or other shape? It doesn’t seem academia has settled on a true shape.

-Then tell me how you would get the radius of anything not a sphere that would be required for both the equations in Einstein’s AND Newton’s gravity assertions.

-Prove the earth is actually a sphere and then with absolution and observable evidence (not math) a radius value of the earth if it is a sphere.

-Then prove the volume of the earth with this radius value that would be necessary to get the mass from the VOLUME of a sphere in the equation V=4/3(pi)r^3.

-Prove that Venus is the same size and density as earth as used as a comparison value to insert in the equation F=G(m1m2)/r^2 which is also used in Kepler’s orbital equations.

-Prove the masses in that equation which would require the radius, a true shape and a true volume.

-Prove the r value in that equation is a CONSTANT. (r being the distance between the two objects in an ~elliptical~ orbit…)

-Then tell me, does water evaporate towards the ground or up in defiance of the assertion that mass attracts mass?

-Tell me. Does the apple tree grow UP before the apple fell DOWN on Newton’s head?

-Prove nothing can move faster than light such as a thought or something as demonstrated by the observable instances of quantum entanglement. All 1875 documented instances of quantum entanglement that file 13’s General Relativity.

Nope. ]]>

Department of Homeland Security could just as easily be called (Bureau, Agency, Committee) of (Homeland, Fatherland, Motherland, State) Security. It translates to the Russian KGB.

]]>You are missing the point. This map is their only model for their “flat earth”, and this post proves their model doesn’t work, as Australia is stretched way beyond its real life size.

If this “alternate theory” can’t propose a proper model that works and fits the size of the continents and oceans of earth, it is garbage.